Physical activity in climacteric women: comparison between self-reporting and pedometer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two methods of assessing physical activity in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women. METHODS: Cross-sectional study nested in a cohort of pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women in a city in Southern Brazil. The participants completed a questionnaire that included sociodemographic and clinical data. Physical activity was assessed using a digital pedometer and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short version. The participants were classified into strata of physical activity according to the instrument used. For statistical analysis, the Spearman correlation test, Kappa index, concordance coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were used. RESULTS: The concordance (k = 0110; p = 0.007) and the correlation (rho = 0.136, p = 0.02) between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short version, and pedometer were weak. In Bland-Altman plots, it was observed that differences deviate from zero value whether the physical activity is minimal or more intense. Comparing the two methods, the frequency of inactive women is higher when assessed by pedometer than by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire--short version, and the opposite occurs in active women. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between the methods was weak. Although easy to use, Physical Activity Questionnaire--short version overestimates physical activity compared with assessment by pedometer.

Atividade física de mulheres no climatério: comparação entre auto-relato e pedômetro / Physical activity in climacteric women: comparison between self-reporting and pedometer

OBJETIVO Comparar dois métodos de avaliação de atividade física entre mulheres na pré, transição e pós-menopausa. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal aninhado à coorte de mulheres na pré, peri e pós-menopausa em uma cidade do sul do Brasil. As participantes responderam a um questionário com dados sociodemográficos e clínicos. A atividade física foi avaliada utilizando-se o Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física – versão curta e a contagem do número de passos com o uso de pedômetro. As participantes foram classificadas em estratos de atividade física de acordo com o instrumento utilizado. Para análise estatística foram realizados os testes de correlação de Spearman, índice de Kappa, coeficiente de concordância e análise das medidas contínuas de Bland-Altman. RESULTADOS A concordância (k = 0,110; p = 0,007) e a correlação (rho = 0,136; p = 0,02) entre o Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física – versão curta e o pedômetro foram fracas. No gráfico de Bland-Altman, observou-se que as diferenças se afastam do valor zero tanto quanto a atividade física é mínima ou mais intensa. Comparando-se os dois métodos, a frequência de mulheres inativas é maior quando avaliadas pelo pedômetro do que pelo Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física. O oposto ocorre entre as ativas. CONCLUSÕES A concordância entre os métodos foi fraca. Embora de fácil aplicação, o Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física superestima a atividade física em relação à avaliação por pedômetro. .

OBJECTIVE To compare two methods of assessing physical activity in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women. METHODS Cross-sectional study nested in a cohort of pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women in a city in Southern Brazil. The participants completed a questionnaire that included sociodemographic and clinical data. Physical activity was assessed using a digital pedometer and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short version. The participants were classified into strata of physical activity according to the instrument used. For statistical analysis, the Spearman correlation test, Kappa index, concordance coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were used. RESULTS The concordance (k = 0110; p = 0.007) and the correlation (rho = 0.136, p = 0.02) between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short version, and pedometer were weak. In Bland-Altman plots, it was observed that differences deviate from zero value whether the physical activity is minimal or more intense. Comparing the two methods, the frequency of inactive women is higher when assessed by pedometer than by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short version, and the opposite occurs in active women. CONCLUSIONS Agreement between the methods was weak. Although easy to use, Physical Activity Questionnaire - short version overestimates physical activity compared with assessment by pedometer. .